A New Playground
(French/Swiss/Italian Alps)
Chamonix - Montenvers - Petit Charmoz - Requin (green line shows where we went) |
Came a time
when our Leader, Joe McCash, judged us fit to knock off a big Alp or two, since
we had bagged a few wee Tyrol Alps without difficulty or harrowment the
previous summer, and he unveiled his Plan: start in Chamonix, thence into
Switzerland, toddle over into Italy and back again to Chamonix, sewing up a
number of Aiguilles of varying difficulty (“granite and sunshine”). All of
which sounded both alluring and cheap.
There would be
four of us: Joe, Allen, Mac, and me. We’d take our own sleeping-bags, stay
mostly in mountain huts, carry our food (too expensive in huts), use a primus for
cooking; it would be sunny all the time. Languages? “I’ll do French,”
volunteered Joe confidently, “Mac can do Swiss, and you [that was me] better do
Italian. Allen can do the currency conversion and expense sharing.” Ho, hum,
I’d better put in some effort at All you
Need to Know in Italy.
And so, train
south, ferry across to Calais, train to Paris, an evening soaking up the
culture (omelette, dodgems, hugely entertaining toilets), then onwards to the
south. The entertainment in the toilets was not so much that they were merely a
hole in the floor bracketed by two raised foot-sized stances, but that they
flushed automatically every x
minutes, and when the ceiling-height cistern flushed and the water rose above
the stances you had to be prepared to climb up the tall cistern pipe in
mid-evacuation, or else be swamped. “Good practice,” said Joe. Practice for
what? Best not knowing.
In Chamonix,
Joe (French) did the shopping: a dozen baguettes. Why? We already had our
staple diet: dry pasta and pemmican, lightweight and unappetising, plus Nescafe
and as many bars of chocolate as we could carry.
(In my geekish
way, I am now going to add heights in feet, as an aid to Really Old people like
myself, who don’t have a feel for the metres which you less old people can read
off the maps.)
verticality |
From Chamonix,
3402ft, we toiled up beside the railway (too expensive to ride in) under our
unaccustomed loads, to Montenvers, 6280ft, where Joe found us an outhouse to
doss in. Here was our first view of the Dru, as the clouds lifted and revealed it
across the Mer de Glace (the local glacier) spectacularly vertical. The head,
used to the angle it needs for looking at the top of the Buachaille from the
road, suddenly finds it has to tilt up, up past the belt of cloud, and up yet more, to see the Dru summit, twice
the height of anything we were used to in the homeland.
view from Petit Charmoz |
(Geek note:
much later I found that the Buachaille from road, an altitude of 2425 ft, 1.28
miles away, involves an upward tilt of 24.7°, while the Dru from Montenvers,
6036 ft over 1.86 miles, needs 49°)
The next day,
Allen and I sewed up the Petit Charmoz, while Joe and Mac knocked off the Grand
ditto, and that evening we toddled up the Mer de Glace to the Requin Hut, at
8255ft, marvelling, as we hauled ourselves up the last scramble from the
glacier, at the carrying capacity of porters who took crates of provisions up
to the huts in training to become guides. No wonder food in huts cost a lot.
toddling up the Mer de Glace |
the Requin hut |
Our next
objective was the Dent du Requin (“Tooth of the man-eater, or white shark . . . so called on
account of its causing requiems to be sung” – gulp). The Shark being 11217ft
high, this was going to be a Munro-sized day, surely easy-peasy? Well, aside
from having to start at 4 a.m. to avoid all the avalanches and stone-falls that
would clobber us if we weren’t back down before the sunshine heated the snow.
Once on the move and shedding sleepiness,
it was beautiful, lovely firm holds everywhere in the red granite, cloudless
sky, glacier shimmering far far down below, altitude beginning to bite a bit
but, so far, not enough to destroy the enjoyment.
Except that we got lost.
Lost! How could this be?
lost: which is the Requin? |
Abashed, but comforted by a bite of
chocolate, we wove to and fro, hither and yon, without ever finding the proper
route, and time passed with frightening speed: long ago we should have been
back at the hut, now the avalanches and stone-falls were going to get us, the
white shark was about to eat us, we could hear its teeth snapping.
So, reluctantly, we embraced the
unfamiliar spectre of Failure, and started the descent. Down is always harder
than Up; Down when you’ve wandered off course is harder still; Down when you’re
hungry and getting tired and can hear the shark’s jaws snapping and it’s late
is yet harder.
Abseiling in those days was simply a
matter of finding a suitable bit of rock to put a sling around, threading the
rope through it and wrapping the rope about your body in such a way that you
could control the speed of descent with your arms. That was fine, we’d
practised it back home on the Cobbler. Not so fine, though, was abseiling into
the darkness where there was no way to know if there would be anything to stand
on at the end of the rope or if you’d just shoot off into space; and least fine
of all was the last abseil where the only thing to loop a sling around was a
loose boulder which inched its way ever closer to the edge as each body jerked
its way downwards. After which the last little glacier, while unduly soft and
possibly hiding crevasses, seemed a doddle, and was extraordinarily beautiful
in the moonlight.
Our easy-peasy climb had taken eighteen
hours, and we had shared a 2-oz bar of chocolate between four of us. Need for
sleep trumped the growling stomach, and we groped through the dark for the
dormitory, where we found our sleeping-bags . . . occupied by dormant bodies
which muttered “Ah, M’sieu, Madame, we ‘ave thought you dead.”
[Note: the photographs are my own, taken
during the events described. Google has heaps of far better pictures of the
places mentioned.]
formidable!
ReplyDeleteFrench formidable!
ReplyDeletethat is most reassuring
ReplyDelete